Qur'an | Word by Word | Audio | Prayer Times | Android | New : beta.quran.com
__ Sign In
 
__

The Quranic Arabic Corpus - Message Board

__

We are currently looking for volunteers to review the linguistic annotation in the corpus. If you come across a word and you feel that a better analysis could be provided, you can suggest a correction online by clicking on an Arabic word. New messages or suggestions still under discussion are shown below. Resolved comments on morphological and syntactic tagging have been archived (5234 messages).

Messages 1 to 48 of 2347:

 (3:16:9) Is there any reason why root letters و ق ي are not... Maqbool Ahmad 3 July 17
 Apparently to save space, only the first and last entries of... Abdul Rahman 6 July 17
 (42:6:12) Lot of times in Lane's Lexicon documents if says... Maqbool Ahmad 26 June 17
 Go to this website... Abdul Rahman 3 July 17
 (14:51:9) 14.51.9 and 14. 51 10 . The phrase saree ul hisaab... Rehana Aleem 30 June 17
 saree'u --- khbar inna, marfoo3 (nominative), and it is mudaf... Abdul Rahman 3 July 17
 (34:37:17) (34:37:17) Whose صفة or should it be مضاف اليه? Maqbool Ahmad 12 June 17
 Yes, it should be simply described as مضاف اليه. N –... Abdul Rahman 3 July 17
 (38:59:10) Is مجرورالنَّارِ because it is مضاف اليه of صَالُو... Maqbool Ahmad 17 June 17
 Yes, النار is majroor because it is مضاف اليه. The noun in... Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 (46:30:9) Appears to be مضاف اليه so should this not be مجرور... Maqbool Ahmad 27 June 17
 Yes, you are right. PN – genitive masculine proper noun →... Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 (47:12:7) Why الصَّالِحَاتِ is مجرور? I think it should be... Maqbool Ahmad 27 June 17
 You are right. It should be منصوب.. Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 N – accusative sound feminine plural active participle Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 (47:12:8) why جَنَّاتٍ is مجرور? Maqbool Ahmad 27 June 17
 Yes, it should be منصوب. like the previous word 47:12:7. Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 N – accusative sound feminine plural indefinite noun Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 (48:25:34) Should تَزَيَّلُوا not be فعل مضارع مجزوم because... Maqbool Ahmad 29 June 17
 The analysis is wrong. The verb here is in the 3rd person... Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 (50:41:4) Should الْمُنَادِ not be اسم مرفوع? Maqbool Ahmad 30 June 17
 You are absolutely right. The expression is actually يناديُ... Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 (18:38:1) Assalamualikum Can you please explain the pronoun... Rehana Aleem 22 June 17
 This word is, in fact, a composite form of two words لٰكِنْ... Abdul Rahman 2 July 17
 (33:33:1) (33:33:1) Should the فعل أمر of ق ر ر not be... Maqbool Ahmad 16 June 15
 قَرْنَ is a contraction of اِقْرَرْنَ. Please refer to... Abdul Rahman 21 June 15
 Lot of times in Lane's Lexicon documents if says "see... Maqbool Ahmad 11 June 17
 (12:32:17) Should (12:32:17) not be فعل مضارع منصوب ? Maqbool Ahmad 3 May 17
 The verb is in indicative mood, but because of the emphatic... Abdul Rahman 2 June 17
 (20:77:13) (20:77:13) How come موصوف is مجرور and صفت is... Maqbool Ahmad 19 May 17
 The موصوف is طَرِيقًا and it is as you expect منصوب. Abdul Rahman 2 June 17
 (1:4:2) It is a general question regarding to the audio... Maqbool Ahmad 22 May 17
 (13:4:13) (13:4:13) Should this not be فعل مضارع مجهول? Maqbool Ahmad 5 May 17
 (13:2:18) Why definition of مُسَمًّى is different in the... Maqbool Ahmad 5 May 17
 (4:119:19) Should (4:119:19) not be مفعول مطلق? Maqbool Ahmad 4 April 17
 I think you unintentionally flagged this. Abdul Rahman 11 April 17
 (4:119:20) (4:119:20) Should this be مفعول مطلق ? Maqbool Ahmad 2 November 16
 Yes, this should be مفعول مطلق Abdul Rahman 11 April 17
 (4:116:19) Should (4:116:19) not be مفعول مطلق? Maqbool Ahmad 4 April 17
 Yes, it should be مفعول مطلق. Abdul Rahman 11 April 17
 (3:120:6) V – 3rd person feminine singular (form IV)... Abdul Rahman 29 March 17
 (3:120:2) Should تَمْسَسْ in إِنْ تَمْسَسْكُمْ حَسَنَةٌ not... Maqbool Ahmad 27 March 17
 You are right. It should be: V – 3rd person feminine... Abdul Rahman 29 March 17
 (73:20:59) Should this not be marked مفعول مطلق instead of... Maqbool Ahmad 4 March 17
 مفعول به is correct. Maf3ul mutlaq would be in the form of... Abdul Rahman 7 March 17
 (48:16:21) Shouldتَتَوَلَّوْ not be مجزوم because of إِنْ? Maqbool Ahmad 17 February 17
 Yes, it should be مجزوم because of إِنْ فعل مضارع مجزوم... Abdul Rahman 20 February 17
 (48:16:15) V – 2nd person masculine plural (form IV)... Abdul Rahman 19 February 17

Sort by date | sort by chapter

Language Research Group
University of Leeds
__